Pinaceae

Pinus albicaulis Engelm.

Native to Western USA and Canada where historically large areas of forests were lost to the mining industry; today it is threatened by wildfire, White Pine Blister Rust and Mountain Pine Beetle

Distribution

Whitebark pine is distributed in the USA and Canada. Its distribution is split into two broad sections, one following the British Columbia Coast Ranges, the Cascade Range, and the Sierra Nevada. The Rocky Mountain distribution extends along the high ranges in eastern British Columbia and western Alberta, and southward at high elevations to the Wind River and Salt River Ranges in west-central Wyoming. The species occurs as high as 3050 to 3660m in the Sierra Nevada and northwestern Wyoming, 2590 to 3200m in western Wyoming and as low as 900m in the northern limits of its range in British Columbia. The total global extent of occurrence has been estimated to be 337,067km² with an estimated 190,067km² in Canada and the remaining 147,000km² in the U.S.A. (COSEWIC, 2010). The global area of occupancy has not been calculated but would be in excess of 2000km².

In the USA, outlying populations of whitebark pine are found atop the Sweetgrass Hills in north-central Montana 145km east of the nearest stands in the Rocky Mountains across the Great Plains grassland, in outlier stands in the Blue and Wallowa Mountains of northeastern Oregon and in small, isolated ranges in northeastern California, south-central Oregon, and northern Nevada (Arno & Hoff, 1990). The oldest known whitebark pine tree is found in central Idaho on the Sawtooth National Forest (Perkins & Sweetnam, 1996). Over 90 percent of whitebark pine forests occur on public lands in the U.S. and Canada.

In the U.S.A. Whitebark pine occurs on 5,085,904 acres (20.06% of the total) on 12 National Forests in northern Idaho and Montana: 2,773,620 of those acres (54.5%) are within wilderness or inventoried roadless areas and another 40,661 acres are designated or proposed research natural areas (Shelly et al., 2010). Another 427,000 acres of whitebark pine occur in three National Parks in Montana and northwestern Wyoming (from NPS websites). Acreages for other areas not available. In Canada the total population is estimated to be around 200 million trees (COSEWIC 2010).

Habitat and Ecology

Whitebark pine is a keystone species of the upper and subalpine ecosystems. It is also a foundation species for protecting watersheds as it tolerates harsh, wind-swept sites that other conifers cannot, the shade of its canopy regulates snowmelt runoff and soil erosion, and its roots stabilize rocky and poorly developed soils (Tomback & Kendall, 2001). Whitebark pines may live in excess of 1000 years. While Whitebark Pine can begin to produce cones at 30-50 years, sizable cone production usually begins at 60-80 years (COSEWIC, 2010). An average generation length of 60 years is used in this assessment.

In upper subalpine sites whitebark pine is often replaced by the shade-tolerant Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii or Tsuga mertensiana (Arno & Weaver, 1990). The shade intolerant tree species Pinus contorta is also found with whitebark pine on seral sites. Other minor species sometimes found with it are Pseudotsuga menziesii, Pinus flexilis, Larix lyalli (Pfister et al., 1977), and Pinus monticola. Climax whitebark pine sites are found at high elevations, particularly harsh sites in the upper subalpine forests and at treeline on relatively dry, cold slopes, where trees often occur in elfin forests, clusters, groves or tree islands (Arno & Weaver 1990; Steele et al., 1983). Most whitebark pine forests have low diversity in vascular plants (Forcella, 1977) with the majority of undergrowth plant cover being composed of grouse Vaccinium scoparium, V. globulare, V. membrenaceum, Menziesia ferruginea, Luzula hitchcockii and Xerophyllum tenax, (Pfister et al. 1977, Arno & Weaver, 1990). Other plants that may be occasional dominants include Festuca idahoensis, Juncus parryi, Poa nervosa, Sheperdia spp., Arctostaphylos uva-ursi and Chimaphila umbellata (Arno & Weaver, 1990, Aubry et al., 2008). High elevation climax stands of whitebark pine can contain many unique alpine, subalpine, and montane undergrowth species assemblages, some of which are only found in association with whitebark pine (Forcella, 1977; Tomback & Kendall, 2001). Forcella & Weaver, 1977) found that whitebark pine forests had unexpectedly high biomass but low productivity.

The large, energy-rich wingless seeds of whitebark pine (Lanner, 1982, Lanner & Gilbert, 1994; Tomback, 1983) are a food source in the fall and spring diets of 20 wildlife species (Lorenz et al., 2008). When there are at least 40 cones produced per whitebark pine tree, pine nuts provided 97% of the annual nourishment for Yellowstone National Park’s grizzly bears (Robbins et al., 2006). Female grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem derive 40-50% of their fall nutrition from whitebark pine nuts (Felicetti et al., 2003). Female bears that have fattened during the previous fall on good pine nut crops typically produce litters of three cubs compared to twins or singletons after falls of few nuts; the link between increased cub production and great pine nut years occurs because fatter females produce more cubs that are born earlier in the winter den and grow faster because mom produces more milk (Robbins et al., 2006).

Human Uses

Between 1860 to 1940, billions of board feet of whitebark pine were cut to support the Montana mining industry; the wood was used for fuelwood in smelters and to heat miner‘s homes; now less than 1000 acres in the United States are harvested each year, typically within a timber sale for lodgepole pine (Losensky, 1990).

Conservation Status

Global status

Endangered A4ace

Global rationale

There is no question that Pinus albicaulis is experiencing serious decline due to White Pine Blister Rust (WPBR) and Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB). In areas where WPBR and MPB are both present the decline in population numbers and population resiliency is such that population sustainability over the long-term is predicted to decrease. Work is being conducted to identify seed trees that exhibit some degree of resistance to WPBR. This work is being complicated where populations are also under attack from MPB. Additional research needs to be initiated into the affects of WPBR and MPB on the mutualism between corvids and whitebark pine pine in regard to seed dispersal. Initial research indicates that when seed-producing trees decline in number, a point is reached where Clark’s nutcracker does not visit the site. Without the caching of seed by Clark’s nutcracker recruitment of seedlings will not occur and local population expirtation is expected. Although concrete figures cannot be given for the entire range of the species, a decline rate of 50% as a minimum figure, incorporating both past decline and suspected future decline, is reasonable and therefore qualifies the species for Endangered under criterion A4.

Global threats

The initial reduction in whitebark pine is attributed to the exotic pathogen, white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) introduced in whitebark pine cover types ca 1925 (McDonald & Hoff, 2001). Mean blister rust mortality is 35% (range of 8–58%) and mean infection of 66% (range of 17–89%) in stands sampled throughout the northwestern United States and southwestern Canada (Kendall and Keane 2001). Whitebark pine does possess documented rust resistance. Artificial inoculation trials of the open-pollinated, phenotypically rust resistant trees in the Northern Rockies indicate rust resistance ranges from 30% (Hoff et al., 1980) to 47.4% (Mahalovich et al., 2006). In the Cascade Range, the percent of canker-free seedlings in 26.3% (Sniezko et al., 2007). The more recent mortality can be attributed to wildfire and a native pest, mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins). The likelihood of continuing mortality due to these disturbance agents is very much linked to the future cyclic pattern of warm weather and drought at higher elevations where whitebark pine is abundant (Logan & Powell, 2001). There have been three outbreaks of mountain pine beetle during this time. The first one in the 1920s–30s killed significant areas of whitebark pine and left many “Ghost Forests”. The second outbreak was in the 1970s–80s. The third one began in 2001 and has been killing significant areas of whitebark pine over the last few years (Shelly et al., 2010).

Approximately 60 years of fire suppression have resulted in seral replacement of Pinus albicaulis to Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, Tsuga mertensiana, (Keane & Arno, 1993), and Pinus contorta. Due to whitebark pine’s range in the upper subalpine and alpine forests, it is presumed the impacts of warming temperatures will result in a decline in suitable habitat, increase mountain pine beetle activity, an increase in the number, intensity, and extent of wildfires (Aubry et al., 2008). A Random Forests multiple regression tree was used to generate a bioclimate model for whitebark pine based on the Hadley and Canadian General Circulation Model (1% increase GGa/yr) to estimate the climate of each pixel; by 2090, Warwell et al., (2007) predict whitebark pine is projected to diminish to an area equivalent to less than 3% of its current distribution. Koteen, 1999) predicts climate change will probably affect the whitebark pine distribution, especially forests at the lowest elevational range.

Conservation Actions

Identification, harnessing and deploying (tree planting) rust resistant whitebark pine in the whitebark pine genetics program (Mahalovich & Dickerson 2004; Mahalovich et al., 2006; McCaughey et al., 2009). Ex situ gene conservation including seed and pollen in cold storage, clone banks, and seed orchards; in situ gene conservation including phenotypically, blister rust resistant whitebark pine and long-term genetic tests (Mahalovich, 2000; Mahalovich & Dickerson, 2004). Prescribed fire is used for site preparation for artificial regeneration of rust-resistant seedlings, to enhance natural regeneration, and for release to favor whitebark pine (Keane & Parson, 2010). Tree protection against mountain pine beetle include verbenone (anti-aggregate pheromone) (Kegley & Gibson, 2004) and carbaryl applications (Gibson & Bennett, 1985).

References and further reading

  1. Arno, S. F. & Weaver, T. (1990). Whitebark pine community types and their patterns on the landscape. In: Schmidt, W.C.; McDonald, K.J. (ed.), Whitebark pine ecosystems—Ecology and management of a high mountain resource, pp. 97-105. March 29-31, 1989, Bozeman, MT.
  2. Arno, S.F. & Hoff, R.J. (1990). Pinus albicaulis Englem. In: Burns, R.M.; Honkala, B.H. (ed.), Silvics of North America, Agriculture Handbook 654, pp. 268-279. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
  3. Aubry, C., Goheen, D., Shoal, R., Ohlson, T., Lorenz, T., Bower, A., Mehmel, C., Sniezko, R.A. (2008). Whitebark pine restoration strategy for the Pacific Northwest 2009-2013. Region 6 Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR.
  4. COSEWIC (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada). (2010). COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Whitebark Pine Pinus albicaulis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa.
  5. Felicetti, L.A., Schwartz, C.C., Rye, R.O., Haroldson, M.A., Gunther, K.A., Phillips, D.L., Robbins, C.T. (2003). Use of sulfur and nitrogen stable isotopes to determine the importance of whitebark pine nuts to Yellowstone grizzly bears. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81(5): 763-770.
  6. Forcella, F. (1977). Flora, chorology, biomass and productivy of the Pinus albicaulis - Vaccinium scoparium association. Montana State Univ.
  7. Forcella, F. & Weaver, T. (1977). Biomass and productivity of the subalpine Pinus albicaulis- Vaccinium scoparium association in Montana, USA. Vegetation 35: 95-105.
  8. Gernandt, D.S.; Geada Lόpez, G.G.; Ortiz Garcia, S. & Liston, A. (2005). Phylogeny and classification of Pinus. Taxon 54: 29-42.
  9. Gibson, K.E. and Bennett, D.D. (1985). Carbaryl prevents attacks on lodgepole pine by the mountain pine beetle. Forestry 83(2): 109-112.
  10. Hoff, R.J.; Bingham, R.T. & McDonald, G.I. (1980). Relative blister rust resistance of white pines. European Journal of Forest Pathology 10: 307-316.
  11. Keane, R. E. & R. A. Parsons. (2010). A management guide to ecosystem restoration treatments: Whitebark pine forests of the Northern Rocky Mountains. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-232, USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
  12. Keane, R.E. & Arno, S.F. (1993). Rapid decline of Whitebark Pine in western Montana: evidence from 20-year re-measurements. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 8: 44-47.
  13. Kegley, S. & Gibson, K. (2004). Protecting whitebark pine trees from mountain pine beetle attack using verbenone. Forest Health Protection Report 04-8. USDA Forest Service Northern Region, Missoula, Montana USA.
  14. Kegley, S., Schwandt, J. & Gibson, K. (2001). Forest health assessment of Whitebark Pine on Pyramid Pass, Russell Mountain, and Burton Ridge in the Selkirk Mountains on the Idaho Panhandle National Forests. Report 01-8. USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Forest Health Protection, Missoula, Montana.
  15. Kendall, K.C. & Keane, R.E. (2001). Whitebark Pine decline: infection, mortality, and population trends. In: D.F. Tomback, S.F. Arno and R.E. Keane (eds), Whitebark Pine Communities: Ecology and Restoration, pp. 221-242. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  16. Koteen, L. 1999. Climate change, whitebark pine, and grizzly bears in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. In: S. H. Schneider & T. L. Root (eds), Wildlife responses to climate change, pp. 343-364. Island Press, Washington DC USA.
  17. Lanner, R.M. (1982). Adaptations of whitebark pine for seed dispersal by Clark’s Nutcracker. Canadian Journal Forest Research 12: 391-402.
  18. Lanner, R.M. & Gilbert, B.K. (1994). Nutritive value of whitebark pine seeds, and the question of their variable dormancy. In: Schmidt, W.C. & Holtmeier, F.K (eds), Proc. International workshop on subalpine stone pines and their environment: the state of our knowledge. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-309., pp. 206-211. Ogden, UT.
  19. Logan, J.A. & Powell, J.A. (2001). Ghost forests, global warming, and the Mountain Pine Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). American Entomologist 47: 160-173
  20. Lorenz, T.J.; Aubry, C. & Shoal, R. (2008). A review of the literature on seed fate in whitebark pine and the life history traits of Clark’s nutcracker and pine squirrels. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-742.
  21. Losensky, B. J. (1990). Historical uses of whitebark pine. Schmidt, W.C.; McDonald, K.J. (comp.) Whitebark pine ecosystems—Ecology and management of a high mountain resource. March 29-31, 1989, Bozeman, MT. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-270, Ogden, UT: 191-201.
  22. Mahalovich M.F. and Dickerson, G.A. (2004). Whitebark pine genetic restoration program for the Intermountain West (United States). Proc. IUFRO Working Party 2.02.15 Breeding and genetic resources of five-needle pines: growth, adaptability and pest resistance, 23-27, July 2001. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA, Proceedings RMRS-P-32.
  23. Mahalovich, M.F. (2000). Whitebark pine restoration strategy—some general considerations. Nutcracker Notes 11: 6-9.
  24. Mahalovich, M.F.; Burr, K.E. & Foushee, D.L. (2005). Whitebark pine germination, rust resistance and cold hardiness among seed sources in the Inland Northwest: Planting Strategies for Restoration. National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Association; 2005 July 18-20: 91-101. Park City, UT, USA.
  25. Mahalovich, Mary F. & Hipkins, V.D. (2011). Molecular genetic variation in whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.) in the Inland West. In: Keane, R.E. (ed.), "High-Five" Symposium: The Future of High-Elevation Five-Needle White Pines in Western North America. 2010 June 28 - 30, pp. 118-132. Missoula, MT, USA.
  26. Mahalovich, M. & Stritch, L. (2013). Pinus albicaulis. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 13 July 2013.
  27. McCaughey, W., Scott, G.L. & Izlar, K.L. (2009). Whitebark pine planting guidelines. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 24: 163-166.
  28. McDonald, G.I. & Hoff, R.J. (2001). Blister rust: an introduced plague. In: Tomback, D.F.; Arno, S.F. and Keane, R.E. (eds), Whitebark pine communities, ecology and restoration, pp. 193-220. Island Press, Washington DC.
  29. Perkins, D.L. & Swetnam, T.W. (1996). A dendroecological assessment of whitebark pine in the Sawtooth-Salmon River region, Idaho. Canadian Journal Forest Research 26: 2123-2133.
  30. Pfister, R. D., Kovalchik, B.L., Arno, S.F. & Presby, R.C. (1977). Forest habitat types of Montana. General Technical Report INT-34, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT., USA.
  31. Robbins, C.T.; Schwartz, C.C.; Gunther, K.A., & Servheen, C. (2006). Grizzly bear nutrition and ecology studies in Yellowstone National Park. Yellowstone Science 14(3): 19-26.
  32. Shelly, S.; Bollenbacher, B.; Bush, R.; DeNitto, G.; Keane, R.E.; Kearns, H.; Lockman, B.;. Lundberg, R.; Mahalovich, M.F.; Manning, M.; Nock, E.; Schwandt, J.; Scott, G.L. & Stewart, C. (2010). Executive Summary. Status and conservation of whitebark pine. USFWS response to petition to list whitebark pine. USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Missoula, MT,.
  33. Sniezko, R.A.; Kegley, A.; Danchok, R. & Long, S. (2007). Variation in resistance to white pine blister rust among 43 whitebark pine families from Oregon and Washington—early results and implications for conservation. Proc. of the Conference on Whitebark pine: a Pacific Coast perspective. Report R6-NR-FHP-2007-1: 82-97.
  34. Steele, R.; Cooper, S.V.; Ondov, D.M.; Roberts, D.W. & Pfister, R.D. (1983). Forest habitat types of eastern Idaho-western Wyoming. General Technical Report INT-144, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.
  35. Syring, J.; Farrell, K.; Businský, R.; Cronn, R. & Liston, A. (2007). Widespread genealogical nonmonophyly in species of Pinus Subgenus Strobus. Systematic Biology 56(2).
  36. Syring, J.; Willyard, A.; Cronn, R. & Liston, A. (2005). Evolutionary relationships among Pinus (Pinaceae) subsections inferred from multiple low-copy nuclear loci. American Journal of Botany 92: 2086-2100.
  37. Tomback, D. F. and Kendall, K. (2001). Biodiversity losses: a downward spiral. In: D. Tomback, S. F. Arno, & R. E. Keane (eds), Whitebark pine communities: Ecology and Restoration, pp. 243-262. Island Press, Washington DC USA.
  38. Tomback, D.F. (1983). Nutcrackers and pines: coevolution or coadaptation? In: M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Coevolution, pp. 179-223. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  39. Warwell, M. V.; Rehfeldt, G.E. & Crookston, N.L. (2007). Modeling contemporary climate profiles of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) and predicting responses to global warming. Proceedings of the conference whitebark pine: a Pacific Coast perspective. 2006 August 27-31; Ashland, OR U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region., Portland, OR: 139-142.

Entry information:

Entry authors:

M. Mahalovich and L.Stritch. ·

Entry last edited:

4 Nov 2019

Recommended Citation:

M. Mahalovich and L.Stritch, 2019, Pinus albicaulis, from the website: ‘Threatened Conifers of The World’ (https://threatenedconifers.rbge.org.uk/conifers/pinus-albicaulis). Downloaded on 2 July 2022.

Categorised in:

Endangered, Direct exploitation, NW USA, Invasive species and Pinaceae.